Has EPA’s Environmental Justice Efforts Reached Their Peak?

The Trump Administration has signaled that it plans to expand energy production, expedite energy permitting, and ‘roll-back’ regulations and practices that impede growth. As part of this effort, Mr. Trump has named Lee Zeldin, a former GOP member of Congress, to lead the EPA.
Mr. Trump has stated that Mr. Zeldin wishes to “ensure fair and swift deregulatory decisions” while maintaining “the highest environmental standards, including the cleanest air and water on the planet.’’ Further, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, heads of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, have vowed to work with the Trump Administration to use executive action “to pursue three major kinds of reform: regulatory rescissions, administrative reductions and cost savings.”

Continue reading “Has EPA’s Environmental Justice Efforts Reached Their Peak?”

WOTUS Redefined Again!

John B. King

By: John B. King

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Sackett v. EPA continues to dominate discussions regarding the scope of jurisdiction over adjacent wetlands.  Now, the Corps and EPA seek to codify that ruling into the regulatory definition of ‘waters of the United States.’

In Sackett, the Supreme Court adopted Justice Scalia’s opinion in its prior Rapanos decision.  It held that the Clean Water Act extends only to those wetlands that are as a practical matter indistinguishable from waters of the United States.  The Corps must establish first, that the adjacent body of water constitutes ‘waters of the United States’ (i.e., a relatively permanent body of water connected to traditional interstate navigable waters) and second, that the wetland has a continuous surface connection with that water, making it difficult to determine where the water ends and the wetland begins. Sackett v. EPA, 143 S.Ct. 1322, 1341 (20243).

Continue reading “WOTUS Redefined Again!”